Cardiol Res
Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.cardiologyres.org

Short Communication

Volume 7, Number 4, August 2016, pages 152-156


ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Door to Balloon Time Improvement Project

Saad Al Bugamia, d, Jamilah Alrahimib, Abdullah Almalkib, Farqad Alamgerc, Ahmed Krimlya, Wail Al Kashkaric

aKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; King Faisal Cardiac Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
bKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
cKing Faisal Cardiac Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
dCorresponding Author: Saad Al Bugami, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Faisal Cardiac Center, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia

Manuscript accepted for publication July 13, 2016
Short title: STEMI Door to Balloon Time
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr476w

Abstract▴Top 

Background: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate prospectively the causes of delay for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requiring primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) upon arrival at the emergency department (ED) and implement recommendations to reduce delays and analyze the impact of recommendations to reduce the door-to-balloon (D2B) time in a newly established cardiac center (King Faisal Cardiac Center (KFCC)). Primary PCI has developed as an effective treatment strategy for acute STEMI, the survival rate and patient outcome are however dependent on the time to treatment. The international benchmark for all programs dealing with acute coronary syndrome patients suffering from STEMI has been established as 90 minutes or less from the time the patient arrives at the hospital to the opening of the affected vessel in the cardiac catheterization laboratory “door-to-balloon time” or D2B. In KFCC during the year 2014, the STEMI, D2B time of ≤ 90 minutes was achieved in 25%.

Methods: We conducted a single center prospective data collection for consecutive patients presenting with STEMI within 24 hours of the onset of chest pain between January 2015 and December 2015. The boundaries of the process began when the patient entered the emergency department and ended when the balloon was inflated during the PCI. Certain well-defined metrics were chosen to drive the change and identify the defect.

Results: A total of 37 patients presented with STEMI. The number of patients who achieved the target D2B time ≤ 90 minutes was 20 (54%). Nine patients (24.4%) had D2B time between 91 and 120 minutes and eight patients (21.6%) beyond 120 minutes. The delays were due to late identifications of patients with chest pain as well as in obtaining ECG, activation and transport to the catheterization laboratory.

Conclusion: There was a measurable improvement up to 54%. Several factors have contributed to the delays in achieving the goal standard of above 90%; these include late identifications of patients with STEMI, delays in obtaining the ECG, activation of the catheterization laboratory and delay of patients’ transportation.

Keywords: Door to balloon; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; Primary percutaneous intervention

Introduction▴Top 

Many scientific bodies like the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend that all ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients should undergo rapid evaluation for reperfusion therapy and have reperfusion strategy implemented promptly after contact with the medical system [1, 2].

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has to be performed in a timely fashion and door-to-balloon (D2B) time benchmark is ≤ 90 min in PCI capable hospital. This strategy is supported by a meta-analysis of 23 trials showing an absolute 2% reduction in mortality with primary PCI compared with fibrinolytic therapy [3]. Many trials have demonstrated that D2B time ≤ 90 min is associated with smaller infarct sizes, fewer major adverse cardiovascular events, and better long-term survival [3-8]. International guidelines in the management of patients with STEMI recommended several performance measures to monitor the quality of delivered patient care [9]. Of particular interest are the D2B time (arrival at hospital to primary PCI) and overall health care system delay (first medical contact to reperfusion); both of these are acknowledged as valuable performance indicators [10-13]. In the year 2014, King Faisal Cardiac Center (KFCC) had achieved D2B time of ≤ 90 min in 25% of patients.

Methods▴Top 

King Faisal Cardiac Center is one of the primary centers which perform primary PCI as treatment for STEMI in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Primary PCI is the routine treatment in KFCC for eligible STEMI patients 24 h a day, 7 days a week. Guidelines recommend that D2B time should be 90 min or less. To meet this goal, multidisciplinary team was selected to improve D2B time. The team consisted of representatives from the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL), emergency department (ED), clinical informatics, pharmacy, nursing services, quality management department, and physician leadership.

The project was a prospective data collection for consecutive patients presenting with STEMI within 24 h of the onset of chest pain between January 2015 and December 2015. The project included all patients above the age of 18 years presenting to ED with acute cardiac chest pain within 24 h and ECG changes demonstrating ST-segment elevation or new left bundle branch block (LBBB). This meant that several patient groups were excluded from the project, including those transferred from another hospital, those less than 18 years of age, those receiving comfort measures only, those receiving fibrinolytics prior to PCI, and those receiving PCI as a non-primary procedure. The boundaries of the process began when the patient entered the ED and ended when the balloon was inflated during the PCI. The D2B time was broken down into the following clinically relevant intervals: door to ECG time (goal ≤ 10 min), ECG to catheterization laboratory team activation time (goal ≤ 5 min), catheterization laboratory activation to patient arrival to catheterization laboratory time (goal ≤ 45 min), and arrival to catheterization laboratory to balloon time (goal 15 min) and 15 min was allowed for system delays. Data were collected and analyzed, and feedback was provided through collaborative meetings with ED, emergency medical service (EMS) and CCL, hospital leadership and staff. Action plans and interventions were put in place to drive the changes in the above metrics which resulted in change in flow of care and improved communications among stake holders.

Results▴Top 

The total number of eligible patients for primary PCI who met the inclusion criteria during the study period was 37 (Fig. 1). The number of patients who achieved the target D2B time of 90 min or less was 20 (54%) (Fig. 1). Nine patients (24.4%) had D2B time between 91 and 120 min and eight patients (21.6%) beyond 120 min. There was a noticeable seasonal variation in the number of patients presenting with STEMI, with the highest presentation recorded in the third quarter of the year, a total of 14 patients (37.8%) (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. The total number of STEMI patients and the D2B time in each group.

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. The distribution of patients throughout the year.
Discussion▴Top 

The results of this analysis convey perceptions into “real life fact” in the management of STEMI patients in a newly established cardiac center in Saudi Arabia. International guidelines in the management of patients with STEMI recommend several performance measures to monitor the quality of delivered patient-centred care [9]. Of particular interest are the D2B time and overall health care system delay (first medical contact to reperfusion); both of these are acknowledged as valuable performance indicators [10-13]. Our data demonstrate only 54% achievement in meeting the D2B treatment time of less than 90 min.

Several factors have contributed to the delays in achieving the goal. Failure to promptly triage and identify STEMI patients has contributed to the major delay in D2B time. The reasons ranged from patients not declaring themselves, lack of awareness to atypical presentations (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.
Click for large image
Figure 3. The monthly mean time of door to ECG time consistently above target of less than 10 min.

An unexpected finding in this study was the delay of the process of catheterization laboratory activation and transportation from ED to the catheterization laboratory which is located in a different building; this was longer than expected and shown in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. Variation in the mean time required to open the infarct-related artery once the patient arrived to the catheterization laboratory is the least to contribute to the delays as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 4.
Click for large image
Figure 4. The mean time to activate the catheterization laboratory.

Figure 5.
Click for large image
Figure 5. Monthly mean time from catheterization laboratory activation till patient arrival.

Figure 6.
Click for large image
Figure 6. The time it took to open the infarct-related artery from patient arrival to the catheterization laboratory.

In the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE 2), 1,832 were admitted to the surveyed hospitals with CCL facilities. Only 198 (10.8%) patients received primary PCI, of whom only 55% achieved D2B time ≤ 90 min.

In that STEMI cohort of 93 patients from Saudi Arabia, timely primary PCI of less than 90 min was achieved in 40.9% of patients [14].

The similarities of these results demonstrated in several hospitals in Saudi Arabia require a collaborative action among health care stake holders to implement proper strategies to improve the local practice and minimize D2B time. The key strategies to improve D2B time based on quality improvement initiative include education campaign for ER staff, immediate activation of catheterization laboratory by ED physicians, establishment of a single call system for activating catheterization laboratory, use of data monitoring and prompt data feedback to ED and catheterization laboratory, development of a speedy referral mechanism to accept and transfer patients for primary PCI from nearby non-catheterization laboratory-based hospitals to increase the volume of patients and finally seeking of senior management support to implement organizational changes directed at improving the health care environment and fostering timely D2B in STEMI patients [15].

Conclusion

Quality improvement initiative for medical policies and procedures is a continually evolving endeavour in all medical facilities that strive to deliver excellent care.

Primary PCI is an effective treatment strategy for STEMI. Current guidelines for the treatment of STEMI recommend a D2B time of 90 min or less for patients undergoing primary PCI. D2B time has become a performance measure and is the focus of regional and national quality improvement initiatives [16]. Our experience at KFCC demonstrates the effectiveness and durability of process changes targeting timeliness of primary PCI. We were able to achieve overall significant decrease in the percentage of D2B time, despite the measurable improvement challenges remain. The process of quality improvement of D2B time continues to evolve.

Limitations

Single center data and small number of patients are limitations, and outcome data were not available as it was not a priority in this quality improvement study.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff of King Faisal Cardiac Center catheterization laboratory for collecting the data and Mrs Chona Barcelona from quality department for generating the graphs.

Conflicts of Interest

None of the authors have any declared conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This project was deemed exempt from ethical approval as it is an improvement study and not a study on human subjects, and hence ethical approval was not required.


References▴Top 
  1. Steg PG, James SK, Gersh BJ. 2012 ESC STEMI guidelines and reperfusion therapy: Evidence-based recommendations, ensuring optimal patient management. Heart. 2013;99(16):1156-1157.
    doi pubmed
  2. Fox KA, Goodman SG, Klein W, Brieger D, Steg PG, Dabbous O, Avezum A. Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome; findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Eur Heart J. 2002;23(15):1177-1189.
    doi pubmed
  3. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials. Lancet. 2006;367(9510):579-588.
    doi
  4. Dryja T, Kornacewicz-Jach Z, Goracy J, Przybycien K, Jodko L, Skowronek A, Kurowski M, et al. Treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in West Pomerania province of Poland. Comparison between primary coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapy. Kardiol Pol. 2006;64(6):591-599; discussion 600-591.
  5. Brodie BR, Hansen C, Stuckey TD, Richter S, Versteeg DS, Gupta N, Downey WE, et al. Door-to-balloon time with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction impacts late cardiac mortality in high-risk patients and patients presenting early after the onset of symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(2):289-295.
    doi pubmed
  6. Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lambrew CT, Shoultz DA, Levy D, French WJ, Gore JM, et al. Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2000;283(22):2941-2947.
    doi pubmed
  7. Kumbhani DJ, Cannon CP, Fonarow GC, Liang L, Askari AT, Peacock WF, Peterson ED, et al. Association of hospital primary angioplasty volume in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with quality and outcomes. JAMA. 2009;302(20):2207-2213.
    doi pubmed
  8. Estevez-Loureiro R, Lopez-Sainz A, Perez de Prado A, Cuellas C, Calvino Santos R, Alonso-Orcajo N, Salgado Fernandez J, et al. Timely reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Effect of direct transfer to primary angioplasty on time delays and clinical outcomes. World J Cardiol. 2014;6(6):424-433.
    doi pubmed
  9. Terkelsen CJ. Time to treatment-door-to-balloon time is not everything. Herz. 2014;39(6):672-676.
    doi pubmed
  10. Bradley EH, Nallamothu BK, Herrin J, Ting HH, Stern AF, Nembhard IM, Yuan CT, et al. National efforts to improve door-to-balloon time results from the Door-to-Balloon Alliance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(25):2423-2429.
    doi pubmed
  11. Lassen JF, Botker HE, Terkelsen CJ. Timely and optimal treatment of patients with STEMI. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013;10(1):41-48.
    doi pubmed
  12. Rasmussen MB, Frost L, Stengaard C, Brorholt-Petersen JU, Dodt KK, Sondergaard HM, Terkelsen CJ. Diagnostic performance and system delay using telemedicine for prehospital diagnosis in triaging and treatment of STEMI. Heart. 2014;100(9):711-715.
    doi pubmed
  13. Thorsted Sorensen J, Steengaard C, Holmvang L, Okkels Jensen L, Terkelsen CJ. [Primary percutaneous coronary intervention as a national Danish reperfusion strategy of ST-elevation myocardial infarction]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2013;175(4):181-185.
    pubmed
  14. Shehab A, Al-Habib K, Hersi A, Al-Faleh H, Alsheikh-Ali A, Almahmeed W, Suleiman KJ, et al. Quality of care in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment -elevation myocardial infarction: Gulf RACE 2 experience. Ann Saudi Med. 2014;34(6):482-487.
    pubmed
  15. Krumholz HM, Bradley EH, Nallamothu BK, Ting HH, Batchelor WB, Kline-Rogers E, Stern AF, et al. A campaign to improve the timeliness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Door-to-Balloon: An Alliance for Quality. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1(1):97-104.
    doi pubmed
  16. Ellahham Md S, Aljabbari S, Harold Mananghaya T, S JR, Al Zubaidi A. Reducing Door to- Balloon- Time for Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction In Primary Percutaneous Intervention: Transformation using Robust Performance Improvement. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015;4(1).


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Cardiology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Cardiology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2829 (print), 1923-2837 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.cardiologyres.org   editorial contact: editor@cardiologyres.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.