Ablation Index Outcome in Redo Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Results of a Short-Term Study

Sarah Jane Lennon, James Mannion, Edward Keelan, Jim O’Brien, Gael Jauvert, Enes Elvin Gul, Usama Boles

Abstract


Background: Ablation index (AI) is a novel catheter-based parameter that has improved the outcome and safety of radiofrequency (RF) ablation of pulmonary vein isolations (PVIs). This index incorporates contact force (CF) (g), time (s), and power (W) parameters. The role of AI in redo ablations for persistent atrial fibrillation (peAF) has not been fully investigated. Hence, the impact of AI on the success of the redo PVI during the short-term follow-up period is the aim of this study.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 39 consecutive patients who underwent redo PVI ablations for peAF was carried out between January 2016 and December 2018. Target values for AI were 500 - 550 for anterior and roof and 400 - 380 for posterior and inferior regions. We compared outcomes between AI-guided and catheter CF ablations (i.e., forced time integral (FTI) of more than 400 g/s) during a follow-up of 24 months.

Results: Pulmonary vein reconnections at redo procedure were similar in both groups (P = 0.1). AF free burden period was non-significant (mean 15.53 2.4 months in AI group vs. 15.22 1.9 months in CF group, P = 0.79) at 24 months. The AI group demonstrated greater numbers of patients for whom anti-arrhythmic therapy could be de-escalated over 1 year (n = 11 (65%) in AI vs. n = 6 (27%) in CF, P = 0.02). Fewer patients underwent escalation of their anti-arrhythmic therapy (n = 2 (12%) in AI vs. n = 7 (32%) in CF, P = 0.15). The AI group trended towards a shorter procedure time (111.6 27 min) compared to the CF group (133 40 min) (P = 0.06). Other procedural details were comparable.

Conclusion: Redo PVI interventions using AI lead to a significant de-escalation in medication during follow-up. Procedure time and radiation dose using AI tends to be shorter. Both techniques are safe with minimal complications.




Cardiol Res. 2022;13(2):97-103
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1337

Keywords


Pulmonary vein isolation; Persistent AF; Ablation index; Contact force

Full Text: HTML PDF Suppl1
 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Cardiology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2829 (print), 1923-2837 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.cardiologyres.org   editorial contact: editor@cardiologyres.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.