Cardiol Res
Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.cardiologyres.org

Short Communication

Volume 2, Number 6, December 2011, pages 293-297


Incidence and Prognosis of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Sepsis

Gretchen L. Wellsa, c, Peter E. Morrisb

aDepartment of Internal Medicine-Section on Cardiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
bDepartment of Internal Medicine-Section on Pulmonary/Critical Care, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
cCorresponding Author: Gretchen L. Wells, Cardiology Section Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1045, USA

Manuscript accepted for publication October 14, 2011
Short title: Atrial Fibrillation in Sepsis
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/cr108w

Abstract▴Top 

Background: Although the mortality rate among patients with sepsis is declining, the incidence of both sepsis and sepsis-related deaths is increasing, likely due to its presence in a growing elderly population. As atrial fibrillation is more common in the elderly, we hypothesize that its presence will be associated with greater mortality among patients with sepsis.

Methods: The Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) database of a large tertiary care medical center was queried for sepsis-related codes and atrial fibrillation.

Results: Atrial fibrillation was associated with older age and a higher mortality in this series of patients with sepsis.

Conclusions: Whether atrial fibrillation is a marker of disease severity or contributes to mortality is uncertain. Further studies are necessary to determine optimal management.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Sepsis; Mortality; Elderly; Arrhythmia

Introduction▴Top 

An emerging challenge in the management of the ICU patient with sepsis is atrial fibrillation. While the current mortality rate among patients with sepsis is declining [1], likely due to improvements in the management of the critically-ill patient including early goal-directed therapy [2], the incidence of sepsis and the number of sepsis-related deaths are increasing, due largely to a growing elderly population [3]. As atrial fibrillation is most common in older patients, we performed a retrospective review over a one-year period of ICU patients hospitalized with sepsis, and we found that atrial fibrillation was not only common, but it was associated with increased mortality.

Materials and Methods▴Top 

From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008, 1466 patients were admitted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, an 885-bed university hospital. All patients admitted to the MICU were queried for sepsis-associated ICD-9 codes (785.52 and 995.92). Patients with a recent myocardial injury during the hospitalization or a malignancy identified by ICD-9 codes were excluded.

Results▴Top 

Four hundred sixty-five of these patients were identified with either severe sepsis or septic shock [4]. Of these 465 patients (203 women and 262 men) with a sepsis-associated ICD-9 code, 132 (54 women and 78 men) developed atrial fibrillation identified by telemetry and confirmed by a faculty cardiologist interpretation of an ECG.

The mean age in the ICU population during this period was 63 ± 17 years, and the mean age in the sepsis population was 62 ± 16 years. However, in the patients with both sepsis and atrial fibrillation, the mean age was 72 ± 13 years.

Of the patients with sepsis who developed atrial fibrillation, there was a much higher percentage of coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes mellitus (40%, 39% and 41%, respectively) compared with those patients with sepsis who did not develop atrial fibrillation (19%, 29% and 33%, respectively). However, it appears that these were also risk factors for the development of atrial fibrillation in the general MICU population (i.e. those without sepsis) as well. (Table 1)

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Comparative and Descriptive Analysis of ICU Patients With Sepsis
 

Atrial fibrillation was strongly associated with in-hospital mortality in the MICU patient (P < 0.001). Of the patients without sepsis who developed atrial fibrillation, 94 of these 196 individuals died (48%). Even more striking is the mortality in the group with sepsis who developed atrial fibrillation where 95 of 132 (72%) patients died. (Table 2)

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Comparative and Descriptive Analysis of ICU Patients With Sepsis and Death (Descriptives for Deaths Only)
 
Discussion▴Top 

Critically-ill patients frequently develop cardiac arrhythmias (up to 90% in primary cardiovascular patients); however, these groups often include those patients post major surgery, multiple trauma, those with severe underlying lung disease, malignancies, renal failure, and neurologic diseases as well as sepsis [5, 6]. Only one report described 25 of 81 patients admitted with sepsis (31%) developing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation [7]. This finding is similar to that of ours in which 132 out of 333 patients with sepsis (40%) developed atrial fibrillation.

Cardiac involvement occurs in septic patients, even without septic shock. The ejection fraction (fraction of end-diastolic volume ejected with each beat) is often reduced, likely through several mechanisms including inflammatory mediators [8]. It is plausible that the cardiac involvement would include the development of atrial fibrillation. However, one study did not link inflammation (identified by C-reactive protein levels) with the development of post-operative atrial fibrillation [9].

Early goal-directed therapy of sepsis was designed to optimize cardiac preload, afterload, and contractility and was associated with a significant mortality benefit. However, large-volume infusion results in less of an increase in left ventricular stroke work index in patients with sepsis and septic shock as compared to other critically-ill control subjects [10]. Whether large volume infusion reduces or increases atrial arrhythmias is unknown.

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation is estimated to be 0.4 to 1% of the general population, increasing with age to > 8% in those over 80 years of age. It is complicated by an increased risk of stroke, heart failure and mortality. Anticoagulation, rate control and rhythm control strategies are treatment options; however, large studies have not demonstrated that rhythm control is superior to rate control in certain populations [11]. Some studies have focused on the prevention of atrial fibrillation, e.g., amiodarone, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) with limited success [12]. Finally, catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation has emerged as an effective treatment in selected patients [13].

Guidelines and strategies for the acute and chronic management of atrial fibrillation are available for many populations [14, 15]. However, after an exhaustive review of the literature, Kanji et al. could not recommend a treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation in the noncardiac, critically-ill adult patient due to a lack of clinical trials) [16]. Management decisions are even more complicated among typical ICU patients who are elderly, have multiple comorbidities, and have been excluded from clinical trials of atrial fibrillation [17].

Our series, as well as others, demonstrate that atrial fibrillation frequently complicates the course of sepsis and results in increased mortality [5, 7, 18-20], although one series reported no impact on the risk of in-hospital mortality [6]. Whether this arrhythmia is a marker of critical illness or the cause of death is uncertain. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal management of atrial fibrillation in this older, high-risk, critically-ill population.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank Leah Passmore Griffin, M.S., Biostatistician in the Division of Public Health Sciences-Department of Biostatistical Sciences at Wake Forest School of Medicine, for statistical analysis of the data. Drs. Gretchen L. Wells and Peter E. Morris are employed by Wake Forest Health Sciences.


References▴Top 
  1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546-1554.
    pubmed doi
  2. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, Peterson E, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368-1377.
    pubmed doi
  3. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(7):1303-1310.
    pubmed doi
  4. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644-1655.
    pubmed doi
  5. Artucio H, Pereira M. Cardiac arrhythmias in critically ill patients: epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 1990;18(12):1383-1388.
    pubmed doi
  6. Annane D, Sebille V, Duboc D, Le Heuzey JY, Sadoul N, Bouvier E, Bellissant E. Incidence and prognosis of sustained arrhythmias in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(1):20-25.
    pubmed doi
  7. Salman S, Bajwa A, Gajic O, Afessa B. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients with sepsis. J Intensive Care Med. 2008;23(3):178-183.
    pubmed doi
  8. Parrillo JE. Pathogenetic mechanisms of septic shock. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(20):1471-1477.
    pubmed doi
  9. Ahlsson AJ, Bodin L, Lundblad OH, Englund AG. Postoperative atrial fibrillation is not correlated to C-reactive protein. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(4):1332-1337.
    pubmed doi
  10. Ognibene FP, Parker MM, Natanson C, Shelhamer JH, Parrillo JE. Depressed left ventricular performance. Response to volume infusion in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Chest. 1988;93(5):903-910.
    pubmed doi
  11. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(23):1825-1833.
    pubmed doi
  12. Adam O, Neuberger HR, Bohm M, Laufs U. Prevention of atrial fibrillation with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Circulation. 2008;118(12):1285-1293.
    pubmed doi
  13. Oral H, Scharf C, Chugh A, Hall B, Cheung P, Good E, Veerareddy S, et al. Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: segmental pulmonary vein ostial ablation versus left atrial ablation. Circulation. 2003;108(19):2355-2360.
    pubmed doi
  14. Wann LS, Curtis AB, January CT, Ellenbogen KA, Lowe JE, Estes NA 3rd, Page RL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (updating the 2006 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;123(1):104-123.
    pubmed doi
  15. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, Van Gelder IC, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2010;31(19):2369-2429.
    pubmed doi
  16. Kanji S, Stewart R, Fergusson DA, McIntyre L, Turgeon AF, Hebert PC. Treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation in noncardiac intensive care unit patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(5):1620-1624.
    pubmed doi
  17. Kitzman DW, Rich MW. Age disparities in heart failure research. JAMA. 2010;304(17):1950-1951.
    pubmed doi
  18. Goodman S, Weiss Y, Weissman C. Update on cardiac arrhythmias in the ICU. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14(5):549-554.
    pubmed doi
  19. Sleeswijk ME, Van Noord T, Tulleken JE, Ligtenberg JJ, Girbes AR, Zijlstra JG. Clinical review: treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation in medical intensive care patients—a clinical framework. Crit Care. 2007;11(6):233.
    pubmed doi
  20. Meierhenrich R, Steinhilber E, Eggermann C, Weiss M, Voglic S, Bogelein D, Gauss A, et al. Incidence and prognostic impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R108.
    pubmed doi


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Cardiology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Cardiology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2829 (print), 1923-2837 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.cardiologyres.org   editorial contact: editor@cardiologyres.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.