Balloon Deflection Technique to Facilitate Stent Delivery in Impassable Situations During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Prakash Kumar, Santosh Kumar Sinha, Najeeb Ullah Sofi, Mahmodullah Razi, Awdesh Kumar Sharma, Umeshwar Pandey, Praveen Shukla, Ramesh Thakur, Chandra Mohan Varma, Vinay Krishna

Abstract


Background: Long and multiple lesions especially in the background of tortuous coronary artery often require multiple stents. The entry and passage of another stent through an already deployed stent becomes challenging because of poorly expanded stent struts, calcified tissue, underlying tortuosity, highly angulated takeoff of the vessel, and lack of coaxiality. It can be facilitated by balloon deflection technique (BDT) where balloon at proximal edge of main vessel stent over a buddy wire helps to deflect second stent either distally or into side branch by blocking potential dead.

Methods: The present retrospective, single-center study included 16,189 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) either through transfemoral or transradial route from January 2014 to August December 2019 at LPS Institute of Cardiology, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, UP, India where BDT was used in situation of impassable stent among 37 patients.

Results: The mean age of patients was 75.4 6.5 years. The commonest clinical presentation was chronic coronary syndrome (n = 19; 51.3%) followed by non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (n = 9; 24.4%), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n = 5; 13.5%), and unstable angina (UA) (n = 10; 10.8%). Type B2 lesion was commonest (45.9%) followed by type C (35.2%) and B1 (18.9%). The commonest indication for BDT was angulation (n = 10; 27.1%) followed by tortuosity (n = 9; 24.3%), chronic total occlusion (n = 8; 17.9%), calcification (n = 7; 18.9%), and distally located lesion (n = 3; 8.1%). The left circumflex artery (LCX) was the most commonly intervened artery (n = 16; 43.2%) followed by left anterior descending (n = 11; 29.7%) and right coronary artery (n = 10; 27.1%). Mean diameter and mean length of stents were 3.3 0.9 mm and 18 6 mm respectively. The mean diameter and mean length of deflection balloon were 3 0.5 mm and 20 5 mm respectively. Lesions were modified using aggressive pre-dilatation in all cases while 19.4% of lesion required cutting balloon for additional modification. Additional wire as buddy wire was used in 54% of cases while wire in main vessel acted as buddy wire in dedicated bifurcation stenting. Stent implantation was successful in 36 cases with success rate of 97.3%; while in one case, stent could not be delivered using BDT. Stent was finally delivered using GuideZilla mother-in-child catheter. Overall failure rate was 2.7% which was contributed by extreme tortuosity, angulation, and severe calcification.

Conclusions: In selected cases of impassable lesions; the deflection balloon technique may provide a simple, convenient, and inexpensive solution without further need of additional hardwares except a buddy wire and a balloon.




Cardiol Res. 2021;12(3):201-207
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1036

Keywords


Balloon deflection technique; Bifurcation stenting; Chronic total occlusion; Balloon impassable situation

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Cardiology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2829 (print), 1923-2837 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.cardiologyres.org   editorial contact: editor@cardiologyres.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.