Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.cardiologyres.org

Original Article

Volume 13, Number 6, December 2022, pages 315-322


Impact of Fried Frailty Phenotype on Postoperative Outcomes After Durable Contemporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Single-Center Experience

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Survival categorized by frailty phenotype in the whole cohort with long-term mechanical circulatory support.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Survival stratified according to Fried frailty phenotype in LVAD recipients only.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Overall survival stratified by Fried frailty phenotype in TAH recipients only.

Tables

Table 1. Baseline Demographics, Comorbidities, and Biochemical Parameters According to Fried Frailty Status
 
VariablesTotal (n = 46)Non-frail (n = 14)Frail (n = 32)P value
IQR: interquartile range; LVAD: left ventricular assist device; TAH: total artificial heart; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; DM: diabetes mellitus; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD: chronic kidney disease; INTERMACS: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support; BTT: bridge to transplant; DT: destination therapy.
Age (years), median (IQR)67 (60, 71)66 (55,73)68 (58, 71)0.867
Gender, n (%)1.000
  Female8 (17%)2 (14%)6 (19%)
  Male38 (83%)12 (86%)26 (81%)
Device type, n (%)0.651
  LVAD40 (87%)13 (93%)27 (84%)
  TAH6 (13%)1 (7%)6 (16%)
Ischemic etiology, n (%)23 (50%)8 (57%)15 (47%)0.688
LVEF (%), median (IQR)15 (10, 20)20 (10, 25)11 (10, 15)0.017
Comorbidities, n (%)
  DM17 (37%)7 (50%)10 (31%)0.225
  COPD8 (17%)2 (14%)6 (19%)1.000
  Malignancy8 (17%)3 (21%)5 (16%)0.684
  Depression7 (15%)0 (0)7 (22%)0.083
  Obstructive sleep apnea7 (15%)2 (14%)5 (16%)1.000
  Atrial fibrillation21 (46%)6 (43%)15 (47%)0.801
  CKD16 (35%)1 (7%)15 (47%)0.016
Lab parameters, median (IQR)
  Albumin (g/dL)3.6 (3.2, 4.0)4.0 (3.5, 4.2)3.5 (3.2, 3.7)0.021
  Prealbumin (mg/dL)15 (13, 19)15 (12, 21)15 (13, 18)0.867
  Total protein (g/dL)6.4 (5.9, 6.9)6.4 (5.7, 7.1)6.4 (6.0, 6.8)0.858
  Hemoglobin (g/dL)9.8 (8.7, 10.7)9.3 (8.5, 10.5)9.8 (8.5, 10.7)0.702
INTERMACS profile (0 - 7)3.0 (2.8, 3.0)3.0 (2.8, 4.0)3.0 (2.3, 3.0)0.177
Aim of surgery, n (%)0.497
  BTT14 (30%)3 (21%)11 (34%)
  DT32 (70%)11 (79%)21 (66%)

 

Table 2. Postoperative Outcomes Categorized by Fried Frailty Status
 
Postoperative variablesTotal (n = 46)Non-frail (n = 14)Frail (n = 32)P value
Drive-line infections6 (16%)4 (31%)2 (8%)0.154
Gastrointestinal bleeding8 (21%)2 (16%)6 (24%)0.689
Pump thrombosis2 (5%)0 (0)2 (8%)0.538
Neurological events7 (18%)3 (23%)4 (16%)0.672